Skip to main content

Table 2 Description of the selected studies

From: Accuracy of robotic computer-assisted implant surgery in clinical studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study (year)

Study design

Robot system

The working principle of camera

Implant system

Autonomous/ semi-active

Patients /Implants

Age (years)

State of dentition

Global platform deviation (mm)

Global apex deviation (mm)

Angular deviation (°)

Complications

Control group

Fan Yang et al. (2024) [36]

Randomized clinical trial

Theta

Infrared ray

Straumann

Nobel PCC

Semi-active

70/70

35.6 ± 12.3

Single tooth lost

0.76 ± 0.36

0.85 ± 0.48

2.05 ± 1.33

None

Freehand

Ningbo Zhao et al. (2024) [26]

Retrospective case series

Remebot

Visible light

Straumann BLT

Astra EVS

Nobel Replace CC

BEGO RSX

Autonomous

15/20

32.07 ± 6.90

Single tooth lost & partially edentulism

0.75 ± 0.20

0.70 ± 0.27

1.17 ± 0.73

None

/

Yu Wu et al. (2024) [41]

Case series

FZ-DISAS-I

Infrared ray

Straumann

Autonomous

74/86

23–65 (45)

Single tooth lost & partially edentulism

0.61 ± 0.20

0.79 ± 0.32

2.56 ± 1.10

NR

/

Jun Li et al. (2024) [35]

Retrospective clinical study

Remebot

Visible light

NR

Autonomous

21/33

41.14 ± 16.49

Single tooth lost & partially edentulism

0.62 ± 0.28

0.65 ± 0.27

1.46 ± 0.57

NR

Freehand, S-CAIS

MiaoZhen Wang et al. (2024) [44]

Prospective clinical study

Yakebot

Infrared ray

NR

Autonomous

13/20

NR

Partially edentulism

0.65 ± 0.32

0.66 ± 0.34

1.52 ± 1.01

NR

/

Rui Xie et al. (2024) [45]

Prospective clinical study

YaZhi, YakeRobot

Infrared ray

Astra Tech EV

Nobel Parallel CC

Autonomous

12/102

35–71 (59.8)

Fully edentulism

0.53 ± 0.19

0.58 ± 0.17

1.83 ± 0.82

None

/

Jay M. Neugarten et al. (2024) [42]

Large case series

Yomi

Mechanical tracking

Straumann BLX

Nobel active

Prima Plus

Paltop

External Hex Co-Axis

Semi-active

108/273

19–92 (57)

Single tooth lost & partially edentulism & fully edentulism

1.10 ± 0.69

1.12 ± 0.69

1.42 ± 1.53

NR

/

Sihui Zhang et al. (2023) [37]

Retrospective clinical study

Remebot

Visible light

Astra TX

Bicon

Nobel active

or replace (PMC)

Straumann BL or BLT

Weigo

Autonomous

39/62

50.21 ± 17. 82

Partially edentulism

0.68 ± 0.36

0.69 ± 0.36

1.37 ± 0.92

None

D-CAIS

Jun-Yu Shi et al. (2023) [24]

Randomized clinical trial

Theta

Infrared ray

Straumann BLT

Semi-active

10/10

47.5 (13.5)

Single tooth lost

1.27 ± 0.46

1.47 ± 0.62

3.64 ± 2.99

None

Freehand

Ping Li et al. (2023) [25]

Case series

Remebot

Visible light

NR

Autonomous

10/59

34–89 (57.3 ± 13.7)

Fully edentulism

0.67 ± 0.37

0.69 ± 0.37

1.27 ± 0.59

None

/

Wenxue Wang et al. (2023) [38]

Retrospective clinical study

Yakebot

Infrared ray

Straumann BL.

Autonomous

5/36

61.20 ± 7.43

Fully edentulism

0.65 ± 0.25

0.65 ± 0.22

1.43 ± 1.18

None

S-CAIS

Shi-Chong Qiao et al. (2023) [40]

Case series

Langyue

Infrared ray

Nobel Active or CC

Semi-active

19/19

46.7 (9.9)

Single tooth lost

0.54 ± 0.17

0.54 ± 0.11

0.79 ± 0.22

None

/

2/9

Fully edentulism

0.53 ± 0.17

0.58 ± 0.17

0.77 ± 0.26

Wei Chen et al. (2023) [46]

Prospective, single-arm clinical trial

Dencore,

Infrared ray

Straumann BL

Semi-active

28/31

NR

Single tooth lost & partially edentulism

0.53 ± 0.23

0.53 ± 0.24

2.81 ± 1.13

NR

S-CAIS, D-CAIS

Shasha Jia et al. (2023) [39]

Retrospective clinical study

Yakebot

Infrared ray

Straumann BLX

Autonomous

20/30

NR

Single tooth lost & partially edentulism

0.43 ± 0.18

0.56 ± 0.18

1.48 ± 0.59

None

S-CAIS

Shuo Yang et al. (2023) [43]

Case series

Remebot

Visible light

Axiom PX or REG

Straumann BLT or BL

Astra TX

Autonomous

10/10

38.8 ± 20.3

Single tooth lost

0.74 ± 0.29

0.73 ± 0.28

1.11 ± 0.46

None

/

Scotty L. Bolding et al. (2021) [47]

Prospective single-arm clinical study

Yomi

Mechanical tracking

NR

Semi-active

5/38

47–65 (57)

Fully edentulism

1.04 ± 0.70

0.95 ± 0.73

2.56 ± 1.48

None

/

  1. NR: not reported