Skip to main content

Table 4 Mean (± standard deviation) of Vickers microhardness (VHN) according to experimental conditions (EC) and time (T) for each brushing condition (B)

From: The effect of different whitening mouthwashes and simulated tooth brushing on surface roughness and microhardness of nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study

Experimental Conditions

Time

 

T0

T1

T2

pb

Non Brushing

    

Control

40.3 (± 2.5)Aa

42.3(± 2.7)Aa

41.1 (± 2.5)Aa

0.282

COW

39.4 (± 2.7)Aa

39.5(± 1.9)Ba

40.7 (± 2.8)Aa

0.391

CPWC

41.4(± 2.3)Aa

41.5(± 2.2)Aa

40.0 (± 2.9)Aa

0.454

pa

0.271

0.042

0.682

 

Brushing

    

Control

40.0(± 1.8)Aa

42.2(± 2.3)Aa

41.2(± 2.8)Aa

0.150

COW

40.8(± 3.1)Aa

41.4(± 2.5)Aa

40.7(± 2.3)Aa

0.842

CPWC

39.4(± 2.5)Aa

40.4(± 2.8)Ab

41.5(± 2.2)Ab

0.296

pa

0.484

0.328

0.756

 
  1. a One-way ANOVA/Bonferroni
  2. b Repeated measures one-way ANOVA/Bonferroni
  3. c Statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). For each evaluation time, means with different superscript uppercase (in the columns) and lowercase (in the rows) letters indicate a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05)