Table 5 Weighted multivariate logistic regression analyses of associations of self-rated oral health status with circadian syndrome

Circadian syndrome

 Excellent (n = 1943)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Very good (n = 3591)

1.11 (0.96, 1.29)

0.150

1.15 (0.99, 1.33)

0.072

1.13 (0.97, 1.32)

0.120

 Good (n = 5260)

1.46 (1.26, 1.69)

 < 0.001

1.36 (1.18, 1.58)

 < 0.001

1.34 (1.14, 1.57)

 < 0.001

 Fair (n = 2111)

1.65 (1.39, 1.96)

 < 0.001

1.42 (1.19, 1.70)

 < 0.001

1.41 (1.16, 1.71)

0.001

 Poor (n = 3061)

2.21 (1.84, 2.65)

 < 0.001

1.66 (1.36, 2.04)

 < 0.001

1.63 (1.32, 2.03)

 < 0.001

Obesity

 Excellent (n = 1943)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Very good (n = 3591)

1.02 (0.87, 1.20)

0.800

1.03 (0.87, 1.21)

0.700

1.01 (0.85, 1.20)

0.900

 Good (n = 5260)

1.15 (0.97, 1.36)

0.110

1.09 (0.92, 1.29)

0.300

1.08 (0.90, 1.28)

0.400

 Fair (n = 2111)

1.22 (1.03, 1.44)

0.020

1.15 (0.96, 1.37)

0.130

1.13 (0.95, 1.36)

0.200

 Poor (n = 3061)

1.30 (1.07, 1.58)

0.008

1.22 (0.98, 1.52)

0.077

1.20 (0.96, 1.50)

0.100

Elevated FPG

 Excellent (n = 1943)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Very good (n = 3591)

1.04 (0.88, 1.23)

0.600

1.06 (0.89, 1.26)

0.500

1.05 (0.89, 1.25)

0.600

 Good (n = 5260)

1.24 (1.05, 1.47)

0.011

1.19 (1.01, 1.40)

0.042

1.17 (0.99, 1.39)

0.060

 Fair (n = 2111)

1.31 (1.12, 1.54)

0.001

1.21 (1.02, 1.43)

0.026

1.20 (1.02, 1.42)

0.034

 Poor (n = 3061)

1.47 (1.19, 1.82)

 < 0.001

1.27 (1.02, 1.58)

0.030

1.25 (1.00, 1.56)

0.047

Hypertension

 Excellent (n = 1943)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Very good (n = 3591)

1.11 (0.93, 1.32)

0.200

1.12 (0.94, 1.34)

0.200

1.11 (0.92, 1.34)

0.300

 Good (n = 5260)

1.28 (1.09, 1.51)

0.004

1.21 (1.03, 1.41)

0.023

1.20 (1.01, 1.42)

0.037

 Fair (n = 2111)

1.32 (1.10, 1.58)

0.003

1.18 (0.99, 1.40)

0.061

1.18 (0.98, 1.42)

0.084

 Poor (n = 3061)

1.39 (1.14, 1.70)

0.002

1.15 (0.93, 1.41)

0.200

1.13 (0.90, 1.42)

0.300

Low HDL

 Excellent (n = 1943)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Very good (n = 3591)

1.07 (0.92, 1.24)

0.400

1.08 (0.93, 1.25)

0.300

1.08 (0.93, 1.25)

0.300

 Good (n = 5260)

1.25 (1.08, 1.44)

0.003

1.17 (1.01, 1.35)

0.034

1.17 (1.01, 1.35)

0.034

 Fair (n = 2111)

1.29 (1.09, 1.53)

0.004

1.13 (0.96, 1.34)

0.130

1.13 (0.96, 1.34)

0.130

 Poor (n = 3061)

1.49 (1.26, 1.76)

 < 0.001

1.17 (0.98, 1.40)

0.086

1.17 (0.98, 1.40)

0.086

Elevated TG

 Excellent (n = 1943)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Very good (n = 3591)

1.10 (0.96, 1.26)

0.200

1.12 (0.97, 1.29)

0.120

1.10 (0.95, 1.29)

0.200

 Good (n = 5260)

1.20 (1.04, 1.38)

0.014

1.14 (0.98, 1.33)

0.079

1.13 (0.96, 1.33)

0.130

 Fair (n = 2111)

1.22 (1.06, 1.40)

0.005

1.11 (0.96, 1.28)

0.150

1.10 (0.94, 1.28)

0.200

 Poor (n = 3061)

1.48 (1.26, 1.73)

 < 0.001

1.25 (1.05, 1.49)

0.013

1.23 (1.03, 1.47)

0.021

Short sleep

 Excellent (n = 1943)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Very good (n = 3591)

1.00 (0.78, 1.28)

 > 0.900

1.01 (0.78, 1.29)

 > 0.900

0.99 (0.77, 1.27)

 > 0.900

 Good (n = 5260)

1.50 (1.17, 1.93)

0.002

1.38 (1.07, 1.77)

0.014

1.34 (1.05, 1.73)

0.023

 Fair (n = 2111)

2.10 (1.61, 2.74)

 < 0.001

1.71 (1.30, 2.24)

 < 0.001

1.66 (1.27, 2.17)

 < 0.001

 Poor (n = 3061)

3.17 (2.41, 4.17)

 < 0.001

2.16 (1.64, 2.84)

 < 0.001

2.08 (1.58, 2.74)

 < 0.001

Depression

 Excellent (n = 1943)

1.00

1.00

1.00

 Very good (n = 3591)

1.32 (1.09, 1.59)

0.006

1.34 (1.10, 1.63)

0.005

1.35 (1.10, 1.65)

0.006

 Good (n = 5260)

1.74 (1.44, 2.09)

 < 0.001

1.55 (1.29, 1.86)

 < 0.001

1.53 (1.27, 1.84)

 < 0.001

 Fair (n = 2111)

2.73 (2.25, 3.30)

 < 0.001

2.07 (1.70, 2.52)

 < 0.001

2.06 (1.70, 2.50)

 < 0.001

 Poor (n = 3061)

4.44 (3.65, 5.39)

 < 0.001

2.67 (2.17, 3.27)

 < 0.001

2.55 (2.06, 3.16)

 < 0.001