Skip to main content

Table 5 Quality assessment of interventional studies applied from CASP (Checklist A)

From: Efficacy of ozone therapy in dentistry with approach of healing, pain management, and therapeutic outcomes: a systematic review of clinical trials

No.

References

Question

Score Max = 20

  

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

 

1

Rapone et al.

2

2

1

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

18/20

2

Sghaireen et al.

2

2

2

1

2

2

1

2

1

2

17/20

3

Sinha et al.

1

1

1

1

2

2

1

1

2

2

14/20

4

Piva et al.

2

2

2

1

2

2

2

1

1

1

16/20

5

Nicolini et al.

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

2

1920

6

Shekhar et al.

2

2

1

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

18/20

7

Schneider et al.

2

2

2

1

2

1

2

1

2

2

17/20

8

Bin Hassan et al.

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

2

20/20

9

Detogni et al.

2

2

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

2

17/20

10

Santos et al.

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

1

2

2

18/20

11

Ramirez-Peña et al.

1

2

2

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

17/20

  1. 1- Aims of the study are clearly stated
  2. 2- Qualitative methodology is appropriate
  3. 3- Research design is appropriate to address the aims of the research
  4. 4- Recruitment strategy is appropriate to the aims of the research
  5. 5- The data is collected in a way that it addresses the research issue
  6. 6- The relationship between researcher and participants are adequately considered
  7. 7- Ethical issues have been taken into consideration
  8. 8- The data analysis is sufficiently rigorous
  9. 9- The findings are clearly stated
  10. 10- The value of the research is discussed
  11. Scores: 0 = No, 1 = Partially, 2 = Yes
Back to article page

BMC Oral Health

ISSN: 1472-6831

Contact us