Skip to main content

Risk of dental caries and periodontal disease among older adults and elderly persons with diabetes in India: a population-based cross-sectional study

Abstract

Background

Oral health is a key indicator of overall well-being, and diabetes, a complex metabolic disorder, often leads to related oral health problems. Given the high prevalence of diabetes among Indian older adults and elderly persons, this study examines the diabetes associated risk of dental caries and periodontal disease among them.

Methods

This cross-sectional study analysed data from 65,562 adults aged 45 and above, based on the 2017-18 Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) Wave-1 survey. We used bivariate cross-tabulation to estimate the prevalence, chi-square analysis to examine the prevalence differentials and multivariate logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (AOR).

Results

Bivariate analysis shows that diabetic older adults demonstrate a slightly higher prevalence of dental caries (20.43%) compared to those without diabetes (18.62%), but there is no significant difference in periodontal disease between the two groups. The regression analysis confirms that diabetes significantly increases the risk of both dental caries (AOR: 1.18, p < 0.001) and periodontal disease (AOR: 1.10, p = 0.008). Additionally, females and urban residents are at a higher risk of dental caries, while rural residents face a greater risk of periodontal disease. Socioeconomic factors, such as lower education and higher wealth, play a key role in caries and periodontal problems.

Conclusion

Effective management of diabetes-associated oral health problems in India requires a comprehensive, population-specific approach due to the country’s diverse demographic and socioeconomic landscape. Tailored interventions focusing on diabetes care, education, and access to oral health services are essential, particularly for high-risk groups like older adults, women, rural residents, and those with lower education or socioeconomic status.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Diabetes presents a significant and escalating challenge globally and the prevalence of diabetes has been steadily increasing, with projections indicating a further rise in the upcoming years [1,2,3]. In 2022, approximately 828 million adults (aged 18 years and older) were estimated to have diabetes, reflecting an increase of 630 million since 1990 [3]. At the same time, the prevalence of diabetes in India has been on the rise, reflecting a global trend, where developing countries, including India, are experiencing a surge in diabetes cases [4]. According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) estimates, diabetes prevalence in the South-East Asia region is projected to rise significantly over the coming decades. In 2019, an estimated 87.6 million people had diabetes in South-East Asia, with a world-age standardized prevalence of 11.3% and the number of people with diabetes is expected to increase to 115.1 million, with a prevalence of 12.2% in the same region [5]. This trend continues into 2045, where projections indicate 152.8 million individuals with diabetes and a prevalence of 12.6% [5]. In India, the number of people living with diabetes was estimated at 77 million in 2019, this figure is projected to rise to 101 million by 2030 and further increase to 134 million by 2045, highlighting a significant public health concern [5].

Diabetes is a prevalent chronic condition with significant implications for oral health, creating a substantial public health burden globally. Individuals with diabetes are at a heightened risk of experiencing oral health problems, including periodontal disease, dental caries, and candidiasis [6]. The intricate interplay between diabetes and oral health is crucial to understand, especially considering the escalating burden of both conditions world-wide [7, 8]. Notably, the burden of oral diseases is not limited to high-income countries but is also growing in low- and middle-income countries, further emphasizing the need to address oral health problems as part of the broader public health agenda [9].

In 2021, the global age-standardized prevalence of major oral conditions including untreated dental caries, severe periodontitis, edentulism, and other oral disorders was estimated at 45,900 cases per 100,000 population and approximately 3.69 billion individuals worldwide were affected by these conditions [10]. Among them, untreated dental caries in permanent teeth and severe periodontitis were the most prevalent, with global age-standardized prevalence rates of 27,500 and 12,500 per 100,000 population, respectively [10]. The global burden of untreated caries in permanent teeth and severe periodontitis has increased significantly from 1990 to 2021, with 2.24 billion and 1.07 billion cases, respectively [10]. While the number of cases rose by 53.0% for caries and 91.5% for periodontitis, the age-standardized prevalence per 100,000 population was 27,500 for caries (a 2.78% decline) and 12,500 for periodontitis (a 1.76% increase) [10]. According to WHO estimates for South-East Asia, dental caries had a high prevalence of 28.69% in 2019, affecting over 525 million individuals, but its prevalence increased only marginally (0.67%) over three decades during 1990-2019 [11]. However, the number of cases rose significantly by 65.26%, due to population growth [11]. At the same time, severe periodontal disease had a prevalence of 20.77% in 2019, with over 306 million cases in South-East Asia [11]. Unlike caries, its prevalence increased substantially by 22.66%, and the number of cases more than doubled (125.95%), indicating a growing public health concern in the region [11].

Oral health is a critical but often overlooked component of overall well-being, particularly among older adults. Diabetes, a major public health concern in India, is known to be intricately linked with oral health problems, including dental caries and periodontal diseases. However, the extent of this burden among older adults from diverse socioeconomic and demographic backgrounds remains inadequately explored in the Indian context. A population-based study is essential to comprehensively assess the diabetes-associated burden of oral health issues in this group. First, older adults aged 45 and above are at an increased risk of both diabetes and oral health complications due to physiological aging [12], lifestyle factors [13], and inadequate healthcare access [14]. Second, socioeconomic disparities can influence oral health outcomes due to variations in healthcare access [15], dietary habits [16], oral hygiene practices [16], and affordability of dental care [15].

By analysing a diverse sample representative of India’s older adult population, this study will help identify high-risk groups, inform targeted interventions, and guide health policies aimed at integrating oral healthcare with diabetes management. Ultimately, it will contribute to a more holistic understanding of aging and chronic disease management in India’s rapidly growing elderly population.

In the above context, the purpose of this study is to investigate the risk of dental caries and periodontal disease among older adults (aged 45–59 years) and elderly (60 years and above) individuals with diabetes in India, using data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) Wave-1 survey. The research seeks to inform public health interventions by identifying high-risk groups and exploring the role of diabetes in oral health disparities among Indian older adults.

Methods

Data

This study employs data from Wave 1 of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI), conducted across 35 Indian states and territories between 2017 and 2018. Aligned with the Global Health and Retirement Study (HRS), LASI gathered comprehensive information on the physical and mental health, well-being, financial security, and family structures of individuals aged 45 and older, as well as their spouses. To select participants, a multi-stage stratified probability cluster sampling method was used, with a three-stage design for rural areas and a four-stage design for urban areas. Before data collection, the survey instruments underwent rigorous testing. Detailed information on the sampling methodology, survey tools, and statistical estimates is accessible through the LASI India report [17]. The flowchart (Fig. 1) shows the analytical sample of this study. Following the LASI definition, individuals aged 45–59 are referred to as older adults, while those aged 60 and above are referred to as the elderly persons in this study.

Fig 1
figure 1

Analytical sample of this study, India, LASI, 2017-18

Outcome variable

The present study focused on two primary oral health problems among older adults: dental caries and periodontal disease. Data from the LASI were utilized to assess the prevalence of these conditions within the previous 12 months. Participants were asked about their dental health using the following questions: “Have you ever been diagnosed with a dental cavity or dental caries?” Responses were coded as “1” for yes and “0” for no. Additionally, participants were asked, “Have you ever been diagnosed with ulcers lasting more than two weeks, or bleeding or swollen gums?” Responses to this question were coded as “1” for yes (indicating periodontal disease) and “0” for no. This coding scheme allowed for the identification and quantification of these two major oral health problems among India’s older population.

Independent variable (predictor)

Diabetes status was determined through self-reported information from the respondent, as available in the LASI data. Participants were asked, “Has a healthcare professional ever diagnosed you with diabetes?” Responses were coded as “1” for yes and “0” for no. This information was used to assess the relationship between diabetes as a primary predictor and its relationship to the specified oral health problems.

Control variables (confounders)

To account for potential confounders, the association between diabetes and the two specified oral health problems was adjusted for a set of sociodemographic, economic, and behavioural variables. Age was categorized into two groups: 45–59 and 60 and above. Residence was dichotomized as rural or urban. Religion was classified as Hindu, Muslim, Christian, or other. Social group in India is represented by caste (Scheduled Caste-SC, Scheduled Tribe-ST, Other Backward Class-OBC, or other) and educational attainment (no schooling, primary, secondary, or diploma/college). Economic status was assessed using monthly per capita consumption expenditure (MPCE), categorized into five quintiles from poorest to richest. And behavioural factors such as alcohol and tobacco consumption were categorized as yes or no.

Statistical analysis

Univariate descriptive statistics, including frequencies and percentages for categorical variables, were employed to characterize the study population. Bivariate analysis using cross-tabulations and chi-square tests assessed the association between dental caries and periodontal disease and participants’ background characteristics. Choropleth maps accompanied by bar diagrams (within the maps) were utilized to visualize the prevalence of diabetes, caries, and periodontal disease across different age and sex groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to examine the statistical association between the dependent and independent variables, with adjusted odds ratios calculated to account for potential confounders. Level of significance was considered at level alpha 1%, 5% and 10% accordingly.

Results

The analysis of a sample of 65,562 individuals reveals significant insights into their health status and demographic characteristics (Table 1). A notable portion of the population (12.86%) have diabetes, while 19.63% suffer from dental caries, and 14.26% are affected by periodontal disease. The age distribution shows a slight predominance of individuals aged 45–59 (52.01%), with a sex distribution (46.49% males, 53.51% females). Most individuals reside in rural areas (64.71%). Hinduism is the predominant religion (73.36%), and the majority belong to Other Backward Classes (37.57%). Educational attainment is low, with nearly half of the population (47.01%) having no formal education. Tobacco and alcohol consumption are reported by 36.37% and 17.87% of the study population, respectively.

Table 1 Descriptive statistics of the study variables, India, LASI, 2017–2018

Prevalence of dental caries and periodontal disease among older adults

Diabetes, age, gender, urban residence, and higher economic status are associated with higher caries rates (Table 2). Specifically, those with diabetes (20.43%) and urban residents (22.21%) show the highest prevalence. Education inversely correlates with caries, and Christian (21.91%) have the highest prevalence among religious groups. Both tobacco and alcohol consumption show slight but statistically significant differences in the prevalence of dental caries (p < 0.001).

Table 2 Prevalence of dental caries and periodontal disease among older adults and elderly persons by socio-demographic, economic and behavioural characteristics in India, LASI, 2017-2018

The analysis of periodontal disease (15.70% overall prevalence) reveals significant demographic patterns (Table 2). Those aged 60 and above, females (16.94%), and rural residents (17.41%) show higher prevalence rates. Muslim (17.18%) and Scheduled Castes (17.73%) also have the highest prevalence among religious and caste groups. Lower education correlates with higher periodontal prevalence rates, with those lacking schooling (17.65%) most affected. While economic status shows no significant impact, tobacco users (16.48%) have higher prevalence, and alcohol consumers (14.49%) have lower prevalence of periodontal disease (p < 0.001 for most comparisons).

Spatial pattern (state level)

Figure 2 highlights India’s diverse diabetes prevalence among older adults, ranging from 4% in Meghalaya to 30% in Kerala, with 13% as the national average. Lakshadweep demonstrates the highest caries prevalence (38%), particularly among women (57% of the cases) and those aged 45–59 (51% of the cases), while Assam reports the lowest caries prevalence (9%). Periodontal disease is most prevalent in Bihar(29%), where elderly constitute 60% of the cases and women constitute 56% of the cases (Fig. 2-(b) & (d)). In India, Lakshadweep has the lowest periodontal disease prevalence (3%), though adults aged 45–59 (72% of the cases) are more affected than elderly (28% of the cases). Across India, women consistently show higher susceptibility to both caries and periodontal disease than men.

Fig 2
figure 2

Spatial distribution of diabetes with age-wise and gender-wise distribution of dental caries and periodontal disease among older adults and elderly in India, LASI, 2017-2018

Multivariate regression results

Table 3 presents the adjusted odds ratios (AORs), p-values, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the sub-population specific risk of caries and periodontal disease among older adults.

Table 3 Results from the multivariate logistic regression analysis for dental caries and periodontal disease among older adults and elderly in India, LASI, 2017-2018

The analysis highlights key risk factors for dental caries, revealing that diabetes, being female, older age, and urban living significantly increase the likelihood of caries. Notably, older adults with diabetics have an 18% higher likelihood of developing dental caries compared to non-diabetics (AOR: 1.18, p < 0.01). Urban residents have a 26% higher risk, and females face a 41% higher risk than males. Wealthier individuals, especially those in the richest quintile, show a striking 36% increased risk. Education also plays a critical role, with less educated individuals at greater risk. Additionally, lifestyle factors like tobacco (AOR:1.22, p<0.01) and alcohol consumption (AOR: 1.25, p<0.01) demonstrates higher odds of dental caries.

The analysis also reveals intriguing patterns in the risk of periodontal problems. While diabetes modestly increases the risk (AOR: 1.10, p = 0.008), older adults (60+) surprisingly face a reduced risk (AOR: 0.90, p < 0.001). Women, however, have a 22% higher risk than men (AOR: 1.22, p < 0.001). Urban residents are less likely to experience periodontal disease compared to rural dwellers (AOR: 0.71, p < 0.001). Religion plays a role, with Christians showing a significantly reduced risk (AOR: 0.73, p < 0.001), while caste groups like SC and ST also have lower risks. Tobacco use is a strong risk factor, increasing the likelihood by 20% (AOR: 1.20, p < 0.001). Interestingly, wealthier individuals face a slightly higher risk (AOR: 1.13, p = 0.001), while alcohol consumption does not show any statistically significant association with periodontal disease.

Age-specific adjusted risk of caries and periodontal disease

Figures 3 and 4 reveal that individuals with diabetes consistently exhibit a higher probability of caries and periodontal disease compared to non-diabetics, though the likelihood of caries increases with age while for periodontal issues it shows a decline. Figure 5 shows females have a higher caries risk than males, with diabetes amplifying the disparity, especially among females. Figure 6 highlights a similar pattern in periodontal disease, with females with diabetes at the highest risk and males without diabetes at the lowest. Figure 7 shows urban individuals with diabetes have the highest caries risk, while rural non-diabetics face the lowest, with a similar age-related increase across groups. Figure 8 highlights rural diabetics as having the highest probability of periodontal problems, contrasting with urban non-diabetics, who have the lowest probability. Figure 9 reveals that caries risk rises with age and is amplified by diabetes and tobacco use, with the combination resulting in the highest probability. Figure 10 shows a similar pattern for periodontal disease, where diabetes and tobacco use jointly elevate risk, which declines with age for all groups.

Fig 3
figure 3

Risk of caries among older adults of different ages and by diabetes, India, LASI, 2017-18

Fig 4
figure 4

Risk of periodontal problems among older adults of different ages and by diabetes, India, LASI, 2017-18

Fig 5
figure 5

The age-specific risk of caries by sex and diabetes status of the older adults, India, LASI, 2017-18

Fig 6
figure 6

The age-specific risk of periodontal problems by sex and diabetes status of the older adults, India, LASI, 2017-18

Fig 7
figure 7

The age-specific risk of caries by place of residence and diabetes status of older adults, India, LASI, 2017-18

Fig 8
figure 8

The age-specific risk of periodontal problems by place of residence and diabetes status of older adults, India, LASI, 2017-18

Fig 9
figure 9

The age-specific risk of caries by tobacco consumption and diabetes status of older adults, India, LASI, 2017-18

Fig 10
figure 10

The age-specific risk of periodontal problems by tobacco consumption and diabetes status of older adults, India, LASI, 2017-18

Discussion

This study highlights the increased risk of dental caries and periodontal disease among diabetic older adults in India, with diabetes significantly amplifying the odds for both conditions. Multivariate regression reveals that individuals aged 60+, females, and urban residents are at greater risk of dental caries, while urban individuals are less prone to periodontal disease. Socioeconomic factors, such as lower education and higher wealth, elevate caries risk, while their influence on periodontal health varies. Across different religious groups, Muslims and Christians are more susceptible to caries, though Christians show lower periodontal risk. Study findings also indicate that lifestyle factors like tobacco and alcohol consumption increase caries risk, with tobacco also worsening periodontal problems. These findings underscore the complex demographic, socioeconomic, and behavioural influences on oral health outcomes in India. The graphs (Figs. 3 and 4) show an increasing trend of caries and decreasing periodontal problems with age. This may reflect a cumulative exposure to risk factors for caries over time, such as diet, oral hygiene practices [16], and general wear on teeth. In contrast, the decreasing trend in periodontal disease might be linked to tooth loss in older age [18, 19], resulting in fewer teeth susceptible to periodontal risks, or possibly a survivor bias where those with severe periodontal disease may not live to older ages [20, 21]. This study reveals sex-based disparities in oral health. Females are more likely to experience caries than males, potentially due to differences in oral hygiene, hormones, or dental care access [22]. While females also have a higher probability of periodontal disease, the effect of diabetes on these problems appears to be more pronounced in females, possibly due to hormonal fluctuations, especially around menopause, when estrogen levels drop, potentially impacting oral health negatively [23]. As evident from this study, tobacco users, regardless of their diabetes status, consistently show higher probabilities of both dental caries and periodontal disease compared to non-users. Tobacco consumption has been shown to have deleterious effects on oral tissues, including reduced blood flow, impaired healing, and the promotion of bacterial growth, which likely contributes to these elevated risks [24, 25]. When combined with diabetes, tobacco use further elevates the risk, indicating a synergistic negative impact on oral health as evident from this study.

Studies have shown that individuals with diabetes are at a higher risk of experiencing oral health problems compared to those without diabetes [26, 27]. Patients with type 2 diabetes have been found to exhibit a higher prevalence of unsatisfactory oral hygiene and a significantly increased prevalence of dental caries compared to non-diabetic individuals [28]. The intersection of diabetes, socioeconomic status (SES), and oral diseases creates a challenging cycle, particularly affecting those from lower socioeconomic backgrounds. Individuals with diabetes from certain backgrounds are more likely to experience severe oral health problems, partly due to reduced access to timely dental care, which is crucial for managing diabetes-related oral complications [29]. For instance, previous studies in Tamil Nadu found that diabetic patients with low SES faced higher rates of severe periodontal disease compared to their higher-SES counterparts [30]. This compounded burden of diabetes and oral diseases among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups underscores the need to address broader social determinants of health [31].

Rural-urban disparities in oral health among Indian adults are pronounced, with rural areas experiencing higher rates of dental caries and periodontal diseases due to limited access to dental care and lower oral health awareness [32]. Urban residents generally have better oral hygiene practices, such as brushing twice daily, whereas rural individuals often rely on traditional cleaning methods like ‘datun’ [33]. There is a dearth of studies showing evidences on caste and religion-based differential of caries and periodontal problems. However, a previous study compares the periodontal status of two tribal populations from Telangana, India, based on their oral hygiene practices and indicates that poor oral hygiene and high prevalence of periodontal disease, influenced by limited dental care access, low socioeconomic status, and cultural factors [34].

The education gradient in oral health problems, notably dental caries and periodontal disease, demonstrates that higher educational attainment is linked to better oral health [35]. Those with lower education levels experience higher rates of these problems, often due to limited health literacy and poor access to dental care [36]. Parental education also impacts children’s oral health, as lower parental education correlates with higher dental caries rates in children [37]. Economic status significantly impacts oral health, with lower socio-economic groups facing higher rates of dental caries and periodontal disease due to limited access to care, poor hygiene, and inadequate nutrition [38]. Economic barriers also reduce preventive care access, worsening untreated conditions [38]. In contrast, higher socio-economic groups benefit from better access to dental care and favourable health practices [39].

As evident from this study, a previous study also suggests that alcohol and tobacco use are significant risk factors for oral health problems, particularly dental caries and periodontal disease [40]. Tobacco, both smoked and smokeless, increases periodontal disease risk by damaging periodontal tissues and weakening the immune response [41]. Alcohol consumption is also linked to greater severity of periodontal conditions [42], as both alcohol and tobacco use contribute to poor oral hygiene practices and heightened risk of oral inflammation and tissue damage [43]. Given the oral health burden among older persons with diabetes in India, addressing these behavioural/lifestyle risk factors is essential for reducing the dental disease burden. This study specifically shows that tobacco consumption is associated with higher odds of both caries and periodontal disease among Indian older adults, while alcohol consumption is linked specifically to caries in this population.

This population-based cross-sectional study has several strengths. It utilizes data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI), which covers all Indian states (except Sikkim) and union territories, with a robust sample size. Analytically, this study provides a comprehensive understanding of the diabetes associated burden of oral health problems, such as dental caries and periodontal disease among the older population in India. Another strength of this study is that LASI’s alignment with the Global Health and Retirement Study (HRS) enables comparability of findings with international research, adding a global relevance to the study’s results. Also, the survey tools were rigorously tested before data collection, ensuring that the data collected from the older persons are reliable and valid. The multivariate framework of the study adjusts for a wide range of sociodemographic, economic, and behavioural confounders, including age, residence, caste, education, economic status, alcohol, and tobacco use. This enhances the robustness of the findings by reducing the risk of biased associations between diabetes and oral health problems. The use of choropleth maps helps to identify geographic patterns and trends across age and gender groups. The study targets two major oral health problems—caries and periodontal disease—that are highly relevant to the overall health and quality of life of older persons. The investigation provides policy-relevant findings by identifying high-risk groups, such as women, rural residents, and those with lower education or socioeconomic status. Thus, provides valuable information for policymakers to design targeted interventions for managing diabetes-associated oral health problems among India’s older adults.

This study, has several limitations. Being cross-sectional, it cannot establish causality between diabetes and oral health issues like caries and periodontal disease. Self-reported data and the absence of clinical dental examinations may introduce reporting bias and inaccuracies in prevalence estimates. Important oral health behaviours, such as brushing frequency and sugar consumption, are unmeasured, leading to potential residual confounding. Broad age categories (45–59, 60+) may obscure finer variations in risk, and the lack of longitudinal data limits understanding of disease progression. Additionally, diabetes duration and severity, key factors influencing oral health, are not accounted for. Finally, findings are specific to the Indian context and may not generalize internationally. The findings from this study are likely generalizable to older adults aged 45 and above in India due to the large, nationally representative sample from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) covering 65,562 individuals aged 45 and above. The study captures a diverse demographic, including variations by sex, residence (urban/rural), socioeconomic status, and substance use type making the results applicable to a broad range of older adults in the country. However, the cross-sectional design limits causal inference, and the results may be less applicable to other countries with different healthcare systems, cultural practices, or socioeconomic conditions.

Global oral health inequality is a major challenge, especially in LMICs, where access to affordable dental care is limited [44]. Universal health coverage (UHC) models in countries like Brazil and Thailand have successfully integrated oral health services, improving accessibility for lower-income groups [45,46,47]. Task-shifting strategies and community-based care are essential for expanding dental services, but health systems need significant strengthening to support sustainable, long-term solutions [47,48,49]. As evident from this study the prevalence of dental caries and periodontal problem is comparatively higher among older adults with diabetes which highlights the need for integrating oral health within India’s existing NCD programs [50]. Policy recommendations include incorporating oral health screenings in primary care, increasing public awareness, training healthcare workers, and providing subsidized dental care for the older adult population from diverse socioeconomic and demographic background. And integration of oral health into public health programs by countries like Brazil, offer valuable models for India and other LMIC countries.

Conclusion

The results of this study have important implications for public health policies and interventions aimed at improving oral health among older adults in India. The significant associations between socioeconomic factors, such as education and wealth, and the prevalence of dental caries and periodontal problems suggest the need for targeted strategies that address these disparities. Public health initiatives should focus on increasing access to dental care, particularly in rural areas, and promoting oral health education to raise awareness of preventive measures. Additionally, integrating oral health care with general health services for older adults, especially those with diabetes, could help in the early detection and management of oral health problems, thereby improving overall well-being and quality of life among older population in India.

Data availability

This study is based upon the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (Wave-1), 2017-18 round of dataset which is publicly available through https://www.iipsindia.ac.in/content/LASI-data and could be accessed upon a data request.

References

  1. Sheu WH, Ji L, Lee WJ, Jabbar A, Han JH, Lew TE. Efficacy and safety of premixed insulin analogs in asian patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. J Diabetes Investig. 2017;8(4):518–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramachandran A. Trends in prevalence of diabetes in Asian countries. World J Diabetes. 2012;3(6):110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou B, Rayner AW, Gregg EW, Sheffer KE, Carrillo-Larco RM, Bennett JE, Can G. Worldwide trends in diabetes prevalence and treatment from 1990 to 2022: a pooled analysis of 1108 population-representative studies with 141 million participants. Lancet. 2024;404(10467):2077–93.

  4. Ma R, Chan JC. Type 2 diabetes in East Asians: similarities and differences with populations in europe and the United States. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1281(1):64–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P, Malanda B, Karuranga S, Unwin N, Colagiuri S, Guariguata L, Motala AA, Ogurtsova K, et al. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019;157:107843.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rohani BJ. Oral manifestations in patients with diabetes mellitus. World J Diabetes. 2019;10(9):485.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Tandon N, Anjana RM, Mohan V, Kaur T, Afshin A, Ong K, Mukhopadhyay S, Nicolaï T, Bhatia E, Krishnan A, et al. The increasing burden of diabetes and variations among the states of India: the Global Burden of Disease Study 1990–2016. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6(12):e1352–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Basu S, Sharma N. Diabetes self-care in primary health facilities in India - challenges and the way forward. World J Diabetes. 2019;10(6):341–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Tu C, Wang G, Hu Z, Wang S, Yan Q, Liu X. Burden of oral disorders, 1990–2019: estimates from the global burden of disease study 2019. Arch Med Sci. 2023;19(4):930.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bernabe E, Marcenes W, Abdulkader RS, Abreu LG, Afzal S, Alhalaiqa FN, Al-Maweri S, Alsharif U, Anyasodor AE, Arora A. Trends in the global, regional, and national burden of oral conditions from 1990 to 2021: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet. 2025;405:897–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Global oral health status report: towards universal health coverage for oral health by 2030. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2022. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

  12. Chan AKY, Chu CH, Ogawa H, Lai EH. Improving oral health of older adults for healthy ageing. J Dent Sci. 2024;19(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghanem AS, Nagy AC. Oral health’s role in diabetes risk: a cross-sectional study with sociodemographic and lifestyle insights. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024;15:1342783.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dey S, Nambiar D, Lakshmi JK, et al. Health of the Elderly in India: Challenges of Access and Affordability. In: National Research Council (US) Panel on Policy Research and Data Needs to Meet the Challenge of Aging in Asia; Smith JP, Majmundar M, editors. Aging in Asia: Findings From New and Emerging Data Initiatives. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2012. p. 15. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK109208/.

  15. Dasson Bajaj P, Shenoy R, Davda LS, Mala K, Bajaj G, Rao A, KS A, Pai M, Jodalli P, BR A. A scoping review exploring oral health inequalities in India: a call for action to reform policy, practice and research. Int J Equity Health. 2023;22(1):242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Mazurkiewicz D, Pustułka M, Ambrozik-Haba J, Bienkiewicz MJ. Dietary habits and oral hygiene as determinants of the incidence and intensity of dental caries—a pilot study. Nutrients. 2023;15(22):4833.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. The Longitudinal Ageing Study in India 2017-18 - national report. International Institute for Population Sciences, National Programme for Health Care of Elderly, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, and the University of Southern California; 2020.

  18. Al-Rafee MA. The epidemiology of edentulism and the associated factors: a literature review. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(4):1841–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kailembo A, Preet R, Stewart Williams JJ. Common risk factors and edentulism in adults, aged 50 years and over, in China, Ghana, India and South Africa: results from the WHO Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE). BMC Oral Health. 2017;17:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim JK, Baker LA, Davarian S, Crimmins EJ. Oral health problems and mortality. J Dent Sci. 2013;8(2):115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bengtsson VW, Persson GR, Berglund JS, Renvert SJ. Periodontitis related to cardiovascular events and mortality: a long-time longitudinal study. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25:4085–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lukacs JR, Largaespada LL. Explaining sex differences in dental caries prevalence: saliva, hormones, and “life-history” etiologies. Am J Hum Biol. 2006;18(4):540–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dutt P, Chaudhary S, Kumar PJ. Oral health and menopause: a comprehensive review on current knowledge and associated dental management. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2013;3(3):320–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Silveira ML, Everard CD, Sharma E, Lauten K, Alexandridis AA, Duffy K, Taylor EV, Tolliver EA, Blanco C, Compton WM. Tobacco Use and incidence of adverse oral Health outcomes among US adults in the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(12):e2245909–e2245909.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Gajendra S, McIntosh S, Ghosh S. Effects of tobacco product use on oral health and the role of oral healthcare providers in cessation: a narrative review. Tob Induc Dis. 2023;21:12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Poudel P, Griffiths R, Wong VW, Arora A, Flack JR, Khoo CL, George A. Oral health knowledge, attitudes and care practices of people with diabetes: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2018;18:1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Basil YAA, Rakan S. Oral hygiene practice of adult diabetic patients and their awareness about oral health problems related to diabetes. Eur J Dent Oral Health. 2017;9(2):8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Manatunge SR. Prevalence of dental caries among patients with type 2 diabetes and without diabetes attending an outpatient clinic in a tertiary care hospital. Asian J Intern Med. 2024;3(1):10–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Borrell LN, Crawford ND. Socioeconomic position indicators and periodontitis: examining the evidence. Periodontol 2000. 2012;58(1):69–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Nand KY, Oommen AM, Chacko RK, Abraham VJ. Chronic periodontitis among diabetics and nondiabetics aged 35–65 years, in a rural block in Vellore, Tamil Nadu: a cross-sectional study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017;21(4):309–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Rawal I, Ghosh S, Hameed SS, Shivashankar R, Ajay VS, Patel SA, Goodman M, Ali MK, Narayan KMV, Tandon N, et al. Association between poor oral health and diabetes among indian adult population: potential for integration With NCDs. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):191.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Kamath DG, Varma B, Kamath SG, Kudpi RS. Comparision of periodontal status of urban and rural population in Dakshina Kannada District, Karnataka State. J Oral Health Commun Dent. 2010;4(2):34–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Singla R, Acharya S, Singla N. Comparative study of lifestyle-related risk factors of periodontal disease among urban and rural population of India. World J Dent. 2016;7(3):129–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Asif SM, Naheeda S, Assiri KI, Almubarak HM, Kaleem SM, Zakirulla M, Baig FAH, Kota MZ. Oral hygiene practice and periodontal status among two tribal population of Telangana state, India-an epidemiological study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Schwendicke F, Dörfer CE, Schlattmann P, Page LAF, Thomson WM, Paris S. Socioeconomic inequality and caries. J Dent Res. 2014;94(1):10–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Mejía GC, Armfield JM, Jamieson L. Self-rated oral health and oral health-related factors: the role of social inequality. Aust Dent J. 2014;59(2):226–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bernabé E, Suominen AL, Nordblad A, Vehkalahti MM, Hausen H, Knuuttila M, Kivimäki M, Watt RG, Sheiham A, Tsakos G. Education level and oral health in finnish adults: evidence from different lifecourse models. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;38(1):25–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ceylan JA, Aslan Y, Özçelik AÖ. The effects of socioeconomic status, oral and dental health practices, and nutritional status on dental health in 12-year-old school children. Egypt Pediatr Assoc Gaz. 2022;70(1):13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Granville-Garcia AF, Dutra LDC, de Larissa Chaves Morais L, Perazzo MF, Ferreira FM, Paiva SM, Granville-Garcia AF. Structuring of the effects of oral health literacy on dental caries in 12-year-old adolescents. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2022;51(5):864–71.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Beklen A, Sali N, Yavuz MB. The impact of smoking on periodontal status and dental caries. Tob Induc Dis. 2022;20:72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Baumeister SE, Freuer D, Nolde M, Kocher T, Baurecht H, Khazaei Y, Ehmke B, Holtfreter B. Testing the association between tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption, and risk of periodontitis: a Mendelian randomization study. J Clin Periodontol. 2021;48(11):1414–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hach M, Holm-Pedersen P, Adegboye ARA, Avlund K. The effect of alcohol consumption on periodontitis in older danes. Int J Dent Hygiene. 2015;13(4):261–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Kim HS, Son J, Yi HY, Hong HK, Suh HJ, Bae K-H. Association between harmful alcohol use and periodontal status according to gender and smoking. BMC Oral Health. 2014;14(1):73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Collaborators GOD, Bernabe E, Marcenes W, Hernandez C, Bailey J, Abreu L, Alipour V, Amini S, Arabloo J, Arefi Z. Global, regional, and national levels and trends in burden of oral conditions from 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease 2017 study. J Dent Res. 2020;99(4):362–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Peres MA, Macpherson LM, Weyant RJ, Daly B, Venturelli R, Mathur MR, Listl S, Celeste RK, Guarnizo-Herreño CC, Kearns C. Oral diseases: a global public health challenge. Lancet. 2019;394(10194):249–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Somkotra T, Detsomboonrat P. Is there equity in oral healthcare utilization: experience after achieving universal coverage. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009;37(1):85–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Patel J, Wallace J, Doshi M, Gadanya M, Yahya IB, Roseman J, Srisilapanan P. Oral health for healthy ageing. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2(8):e521–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Pallangyo ES, Ndirangu E, Mwasha L, Lyimo M, Namukwaya C, Premji S, Squires A. Task shifting to attain sustainable development goals and universal health coverage: what are the consequences to the nursing and midwifery profession? Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;102:103453.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Maunder P, Landes D. An evaluation of the role played by community pharmacies in oral healthcare situated in a primary care trust in the north of England. Br Dent J. 2005;199(4):219–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Rawal I, Ghosh S, Hameed SS, Shivashankar R, Ajay VS, Patel SA, Goodman M, Ali MK, Narayan KV, Tandon N. Association between poor oral health and diabetes among Indian adult population: potential for integration with NCDs. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19:1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the data services by International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai-88, India for making the data available for this study.

Funding

Authors did not receive any grant or funding from any sources to conduct this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.S. and J.K.: Conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, investigation: J.K. and S.S.: writing original draft, review and editing. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junaid Khan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The analysis relies on secondary data which is available in the public domain for research purposes, so no approval from an institutional review board (IRB) was necessary. Thus, no ethical approval was required further to conduct the study.

The Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) is a survey of individuals aged 45 and older and their spouses irrespective of their age. The survey was conducted by International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai; the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), Boston; and the University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles. To conduct the survey, the aforementioned institutes obtained the ethical approvals from the following collaborating organizations: Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Delhi; IRB, International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai; IRB, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (HSPH), Boston; IRB, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles; IRB, ICMR National AIDS Research Institute (NARI), Pune; and IRB, Regional Geriatric Centres (RGCs), MoHFW. The survey agencies conducted the fieldwork after obtaining prior consent from the respondents.

As part of the implementing the survey, survey participants were informed of the survey’s purpose, measures to protect their privacy, and the safety of health assessments as part of the informed consent process. In line with human subject protection protocols, four consent forms were utilized in LASI: household informed consent, individual informed consent, consent for dried blood sample collection for storage and future use, and consent for proxy interviews. Additionally, following recommended ethical guidelines, participants were provided with a copy of the consent forms, a biomarker results report card, and referral letters to public health facilities if any health measurements were found to be outside the normal range.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shaw, S., Khan, J. Risk of dental caries and periodontal disease among older adults and elderly persons with diabetes in India: a population-based cross-sectional study. BMC Oral Health 25, 737 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12903-025-06067-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12903-025-06067-2

Keywords